![]() ![]() Though the outside commentary directed at the Manual can be a useful resource, on whole it is fragmented-scattered across various platforms, and sometimes emanates from sources whose credibility may be mediocre at best. This outside perspective is particularly useful in the coalition context, where competing legal interpretations and perspectives can impede effective interoperability. The criticism and commentary directed at the Manual can be a valuable resource for practitioners by highlighting limitations and provisions that may be contested outside (and sometimes inside) the DoD. The tome attracts a great deal of criticism, but that is to be expected-it is, after all, a big target.ĭownload: DoD Law of War Manual (Updated Dec 2016) Starr’s unequivocal conclusion is “Absolutely nothing.” The commentary that invokes Starr reaches a similar conclusion regarding the Manual, and that observer is certainly not alone in this criticism.Ĭomprehensive compilation or good-for-nothing paperweight, the Manual is the authority related to the law of armed conflict presented by the DoD as a “resource for DoD personnel-including commanders, legal practitioners, and other military and civilian personnel.” Despite any perceived flaws and limitations, the Manual offers a consolidated collection of commentary on a vast array of topics involving the law of war. ![]() ![]() ![]() One notable commentary asks of the Manual, “ What is it good for?,” thus channeling the rhetorical question about war posed by Edwin Starr’s 1970 classic soul smash hit. The Department of Defense’s (DoD) Law of War Manual (Manual) has been lauded as a comprehensive guide for practitioners and mocked as an inept effort to describe the law of war. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |